Keep Server Online
If you find the Apache Lounge, the downloads and overall help useful, please express your satisfaction with a donation.
or
A donation makes a contribution towards the costs, the time and effort that's going in this site and building.
Thank You! Steffen
Your donations will help to keep this site alive and well, and continuing building binaries. Apache Lounge is not sponsored.
| |
|
Topic: Limit simultaneous requests per user on apache? |
|
Author |
|
dke
Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 61 Location: sweden
|
Posted: Wed 22 Aug '07 22:49 Post subject: Limit simultaneous requests per user on apache? |
|
|
Hi,
I've noticed that on Apache with mpm_winnt (windows NT) each user is limited to 4 requests simultaneously. Is there way to change this value?
I'd like to lower it as my server can barely handle over 20 requests at an efficient rate (high MS problems above that) and each user getting 4 requests simultaneously is a disaster, load time for pages with thumbs would be slower with 1 request, but it would at least be a solid progress.
I've tried google and the apache documentation without any luck, so i hope you guys can help me!
Thanks in advance.
EDIT: Found out this was related to Keepalive, turned it off and i only have 1 request per user now simultaneously, i guess this setting is good for pages with REAL high load, but for my page with so much dynamic stuff it seems better to leave it off. |
|
Back to top |
|
tdonovan Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Milford, MA, USA
|
Posted: Thu 23 Aug '07 20:41 Post subject: re: simultaneous requests per user |
|
|
Usually it is the browser which limits the simultaneous requests per user - not Apache.
RFC 2068 and RFC 2616 recommend two for HTTP 1.1: A single-user client SHOULD maintain AT MOST 2 connections with any server or proxy. but many HTTP 1.0 browsers use four connections.
Turning keepalive off causes the connection to be closed after each request, so it will usually appear to be one simultaneous request unless you look at the exact instant that two requests are being served.
If this is still Coppermine you are discussing, it might be better to keep it all in your original post for continuity.
Out of curiosity I downloaded Coppermine and gave it a try. I see pretty much the same performance issues as you do. I'll post the details as a reply to your original post.
-tom- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|