Author |
|
admin Site Admin
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 692
|
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
|
Back to top |
|
admin Site Admin
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Mon 17 Jun '19 14:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Now 1.2.46 VS16 available |
|
Back to top |
|
muentzer
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon 14 Dec '20 0:08 Post subject: Request for mod_jk 1.2.48 |
|
|
Could you please supply a binary (VS16, 64bit) of mod_jk 1.2.48?
Would be greatly appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Mon 14 Dec '20 12:19 Post subject: |
|
|
VS16 updated to mod_jk 1.2.48. VC15 on request. |
|
Back to top |
|
abrauer-cpt
Joined: 08 Apr 2022 Posts: 11 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 12:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible that you supply a binary of mod_jk (VS17,64bit)? |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 13:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Sure. Added. |
|
Back to top |
|
abrauer-cpt
Joined: 08 Apr 2022 Posts: 11 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed 18 Jan '23 14:33 Post subject: |
|
|
Many thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
tkwt
Joined: 12 Oct 2022 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu 19 Jan '23 8:33 Post subject: Wrong VS version in ReadMe? |
|
|
The readme for mod_jk 1.2.48 for Apache 2.4 Win64 VS17 build states:
Quote: | Build with Visual StudioŽ 2019 (VS16) |
Is the (VS16) part intentional, or meant to be (VS17)? |
|
Back to top |
|
jmazon
Joined: 30 May 2023 Posts: 2 Location: spain, donosti
|
Posted: Thu 01 Jun '23 18:31 Post subject: No permissions to download |
|
|
hello
I'm new in the forum.
I need to download mod_jk but it tells me I don't have enough permissions
I don't know how I can get these permissions.
Could you help me?
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
admin Site Admin
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 692
|
Posted: Thu 01 Jun '23 19:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Should work, there are no permissions needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
jmazon
Joined: 30 May 2023 Posts: 2 Location: spain, donosti
|
Posted: Tue 06 Jun '23 19:26 Post subject: No permissions to download |
|
|
Sorry.
It was the antivirus settings |
|
Back to top |
|
muentzer
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri 15 Sep '23 11:42 Post subject: 1.2.49 released |
|
|
mod_jk 1.2.49 was just released. Would be great if you could supply a binary. |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Thu 21 Sep '23 14:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Updated.
Thanks for the heads up ! |
|
Back to top |
|
MassimoRE
Joined: 25 Sep 2023 Posts: 1 Location: Italy, Reggio Emilia
|
Posted: Mon 25 Sep '23 16:50 Post subject: mod_jk 1.2.49 result as mod_jk 1.2.48 |
|
|
Hi,
in te zip file the mod_jk.so resuls as 1.2.48 and not 1.2.49
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
muentzer
Joined: 01 May 2006 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Mon 25 Sep '23 17:49 Post subject: |
|
|
Steffen wrote: | Updated.
Thanks for the heads up ! |
Thank you! Very much appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
Posted: Tue 26 Sep '23 9:29 Post subject: Re: mod_jk 1.2.49 result as mod_jk 1.2.48 |
|
|
MassimoRE wrote: |
in te zip file the mod_jk.so resuls as 1.2.48 and not 1.2.49
Thanks |
Changed to 1.2.49. My fault, did not copy. |
|
Back to top |
|
kostya
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 5 Location: Israel
|
Posted: Thu 14 Dec '23 23:10 Post subject: mod_jk 1.2.49 win32 binary |
|
|
Is it possible to supply a binary of mod_jk 1.2.49 (win32, VS17) ? |
|
Back to top |
|
Steffen Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005 Posts: 3092 Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
|
Back to top |
|
kostya
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 5 Location: Israel
|
Posted: Wed 20 Dec '23 11:58 Post subject: |
|
|
appreciate and will update |
|
Back to top |
|