| Author |
|
Jan-E
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1266
Location: Amsterdam, NL, EU
|
|
| Back to top |
|
C0nw0nk
Joined: 07 Oct 2013
Posts: 241
Location: United Kingdom, London
|
 Posted: Sat 16 Nov '13 20:58 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Thanks jan i prefer using your builds also PGO is just a developer tool right ? Not useful for us who intend to use this in a production environment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jan-E
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1266
Location: Amsterdam, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Tue 19 Nov '13 1:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| No, they were compiled with the PGO-data from typical use-cases. The result is that they are faster then my builds. I once estimated the difference to be 10-15%. For PHP 5.5.6 you can mix my builds with the official PHP.net builds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
C0nw0nk
Joined: 07 Oct 2013
Posts: 241
Location: United Kingdom, London
|
| Posted: Tue 19 Nov '13 16:10 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh ok thanks for the information so so i can use there builds but i can still download and use you're extensions should not matter how you compiled those right  ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
bagu
Joined: 06 Jan 2011
Posts: 193
Location: France
|
| Posted: Tue 19 Nov '13 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
Is there a way to have a clean version of php using PGO, and a package with the non-default extension in an other package ?
Thanks in advance.
Other question, i read that php 5.5.6 is already compiled with PGO. Is that true ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jan-E
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1266
Location: Amsterdam, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Wed 20 Nov '13 14:42 Post subject: |
|
|
The PHP-builds from PHP.net for 5.4.22 and 5.5.6 are built with-pgo. It is no problem to use the 5.5.6 builds from PHP.net and add the extensions in my builds to them. Best of both worlds.
But with 5.4.22 you have to be careful, because of the difference in OenSSL versions.
Last edited by Jan-E on Fri 13 Dec '13 4:28; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
gijs
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 189
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun 24 Nov '13 16:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| What is the difference between: php_opcache54.dll and php_opcache.dll? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Millennium
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 179
Location: Leiderdorp, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Tue 26 Nov '13 12:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| gijs wrote: | | What is the difference between: php_opcache54.dll and php_opcache.dll? |
Nothing  Just the sharedMemory pointer file on disk is named different, so you can use them together |
|
| Back to top |
|
C0nw0nk
Joined: 07 Oct 2013
Posts: 241
Location: United Kingdom, London
|
| Posted: Mon 06 Jan '14 5:16 Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Jan-E i noticed you provide allot of self compiled extensions here is one i used (used being the key word here) from php.net, You do not provide it in any of your builds but it is a good extension.
It is for mysql query caching the only reason i dont still use it is because it is not stable and my php outputs had some.. strange behaviour and caused some errors.
But it was a brilliant extension for performance and maybe all it needs is compiling for a build like yours
http://pecl.php.net/package/mysqlnd_qc
http://windows.php.net/downloads/pecl/releases/mysqlnd_qc/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jan-E
Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Posts: 1266
Location: Amsterdam, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Fri 10 Jan '14 22:03 Post subject: |
|
|
| @C0nw0nk: I added mysqlnd_qc to my (new) builds, but without APC and SQLite support. I was getting unresolved external symbols when I tried to add support for one of those. Let me know if they are of any use for you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
