Keep Server Online
If you find the Apache Lounge, the downloads and overall help useful, please express your satisfaction with a donation.
or
A donation makes a contribution towards the costs, the time and effort that's going in this site and building.
Thank You! Steffen
Your donations will help to keep this site alive and well, and continuing building binaries. Apache Lounge is not sponsored.
| |
|
Topic: Upgrading Openssl without touching existing running Apache ? |
|
Author |
|
shishir
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 Posts: 7 Location: India, Bangalore
|
Posted: Wed 14 Mar '12 9:46 Post subject: Upgrading Openssl without touching existing running Apache ? |
|
|
Hi,
I have installed Apache version 2.2.22 which comes by default openssl 0.9.8t.
I have downloaded the latest version of openssl "Win32 OpenSSL v1.0.0g" from
http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html
I have installed it separately on different location.
Can body provide me the steps to integrate openssl 1.00g to the apache 2.2.22 ( to replace openssl 0.9.8t)?
Thanks,
Shishir |
|
Back to top |
|
glsmith Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Posts: 2268 Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
Posted: Wed 14 Mar '12 11:44 Post subject: |
|
|
No.
1. Your Apache's mod_ssl is linked to OpenSSL 0.9.8t, so when you try and use this 1.0.0g, it will crash Apache. That page says nothing about including mod_ssl.
2. I may be wrong here, but you downloaded your Apache from Apache.Org? If so, your Apache was built with VC6, not VC 2008 as that OpenSSL you got from that link is. Now you're mixing two different version of msvcrt.dlls. This often has a disastrous outcome, for some people it works, others not.
If you want Apache 2.2.22 with OpenSSL 1.0.0g, you can get the entire package here, on the download page you will find them. You can find one as well with 0.9.8t even. The one thing is, the mod_ssl included in the package with 1.0.0g is built for 1.0.0g and you will not have the problem described in #1 above. It's also all built on VC2008 as well, so no possibility of the problem described in #2 above. |
|
Back to top |
|
shishir
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 Posts: 7 Location: India, Bangalore
|
Posted: Wed 14 Mar '12 12:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for clarifying the doubts.
I'll the version available here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|