| Author |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
 Posted: Fri 08 May '09 16:45 Post subject: mod_ntml for RedHat |
 |
|
Hi
I am trying out NTLM authentication on unix. For this I am looking for a mod_ntlm.so file for RedHat Rel 4.
Can anyone point me from where i can download.
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 16:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| the environment will be Oracle Application Server 10.1.2 running on Redhat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 16:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| using Apache 1.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
James Blond
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 7373
Location: Germany, Next to Hamburg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 17:09 Post subject: |
|
|
i looked at that and i am getting compile errors..
apxs -c -Wc,-Wall mod_ntlm.c
apxs:Error: /usr/bin/apu-config not found!.
make: *** [mod_ntlm.so] Error 1
dont know where to get these packages from
Thanks
-PS |
|
| Back to top |
|
James Blond
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 7373
Location: Germany, Next to Hamburg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 17:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I haven't looked at apr site, will take a look now.
I downloaded the tar file and untared and issued the make command and I am getting this error..
$ make
apxs -c -Wc,-Wall mod_ntlm.c
apxs:Error: /usr/bin/apu-config not found!.
make: *** [mod_ntlm.so] Error 1
Thanks
-PS |
|
| Back to top |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 17:55 Post subject: |
|
|
I'd think RH would be similar to Fedora since .. they are much in the same
yum install apr
yum install apr-util
those are guesses.
1.3 does not use APR AFAIK so I will assume at this point apxs needs it for sum dum reason, or doesn't need it at all but thinks you are building a module for 2.x. You may only need the util but this all theory anyway since I'm in uncharted hostile territory here.
I do see a 1.3 version of the module source at the website.
hope you are using that.
Maybe I'll give it a try tonight on the Fedora box and see how it goes. I'm trying to get on a friendlier basis with *nix anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
paulstadler
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri 08 May '09 20:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks. I look forward to ur findings |
|
| Back to top |
|
glsmith
Moderator
Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: Sun Diego, USA
|
| Posted: Sat 09 May '09 1:19 Post subject: |
|
|
I just took a look at apxs (as is today) and apsx that comes with the Apache 1.3 version .. there is quite a difference in them.
If your's does not look somewhat similar to this inside
| Code: | my $CFG_LIBS_SHLIB = q(ApacheCore.lib kernel32.lib advapi32.lib wsock32.lib ws2_32.lib); # substituted via Makefile.tmpl
my $CFG_PREFIX = q(/Apache); # substit
my $CFG_SBINDIR = q(/Apache); # substit
my $CFG_INCLUDEDIR = q(/Apache/include); #
my $CFG_LIBEXECDIR = q(/Apache/modules); #
my $CFG_SYSCONFDIR = q(/Apache/conf); # sub
|
chances are you are using too new a version of APSX .. which is not surprising since I am sure RH is shipping with Apache 2.x
Obviously yours will not have all the Windows Lib files in it (kernel32, etc etc), but it should show the ApacheCore.lib
And now I can definitely say Apache 1.3 is not connected in any way to APR .. that was post 1.3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
