| Author |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3092
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
 Posted: Sat 14 Jun '08 20:54 Post subject: Apache 2.2.9a with IPV6 enabled available |
 |
|
Build with IPV6 enabled. (build with VC9)
Apache 2.2.9-ipv6 with apr-1.3.2 apr-util-1.3.2 apr-iconv-1.2.1 openssl-0.9.8h+asm zlib-1.2.3+asm
Update 21 September 2008, new version, see www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=11931
Steffen
Last edited by Steffen on Sun 21 Sep '08 11:33; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
dj02
Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 23
Location: FI, EU
|
| Posted: Sat 14 Jun '08 21:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Working well 
My OS: Windows Vista Ultimate with SP1 x64, Finnish + All Updates Installed
Network using: IPv4 Native & IPv6 Native |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sob
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 30
|
| Posted: Thu 19 Jun '08 3:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Again, no success with IPv6 and WinXP or Win2003.
So I humbly remind my small (updated) patch. 
http://web.hisoftware.cz/sob/download/apache-2.2.9-winxp-ipv6.patch
It works and more importantly, it does not break anything.
I don't think that testing for APR_WIN_VISTA is a problem. Every Windows before Vista have separate IPv4/6 stacks and therefore all sockets will always be V6ONLY there. Unfortunately, the IPV6_V6ONLY is only recognized since Vista. So "if (apr_os_level < APR_WIN_VISTA)" really covers all.
Even with this patch, IPv6 still won't work with Win2000 and WinNT4, but that's completely different issue not related to this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3092
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Thu 19 Jun '08 20:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Sob.
I shall make a build with your Patch with APR132.
I also propose that you post your conclusions at the Apache dev list.
Steffen |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3092
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Thu 19 Jun '08 21:22 Post subject: |
|
|
Updated the download in the start post:
Applied the fix from Sob (thanks)
Upgraded APR to version 1.3.2
Steffen |
|
| Back to top |
|
jose
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Fri 20 Jun '08 18:26 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks steffen and Sob. 
Apache it working in windows vista basic and xp sp3 with ipv6 enable.
but the others pc´s can´t connected with apache
Why?
thanks for everything.
Gracias steffen y sob.
Su trabajo fue de gran ayuda ya que apache esta trabajando en Windows vista basic y XP sp3 con ipv6 habilitado en los dos SO.
pero las computadores no pueden conctarse al servidor de apache
Porque?
gracias por todo |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sob
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 30
|
| Posted: Fri 20 Jun '08 20:47 Post subject: |
|
|
There can be many reasons.
First check if Apache correctly listens on all addresses it's supposed to, using eg. TCPView or netstat. Or just connect to it from localhost. Then you can check if some firewall is not blocking the connection from other PCs. If not, then it must work at least for PCs connected to the same network segment (same switch). If it does, but doesn't work for PCs from other networks, then it might be router's fault. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3092
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Tue 24 Jun '08 23:18 Post subject: |
|
|
I saw you post on the dev list, no replies yet.
Maybe even a better idea is to post it at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ . Mosly it gets then the attention.
Steffen |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sob
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Posts: 30
|
| Posted: Wed 02 Jul '08 1:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Finally there, bug 45321. |
|
| Back to top |
|
cyclone
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 16
Location: St Louis
|
| Posted: Wed 02 Jul '08 22:20 Post subject: |
|
|
Upgraded to the 2.2.9a from 2.2.8 and it is significantly more stable under very heavy load. I am guessing inclusion of PR 44402 makes the difference. Used to seg fault once or twice a day per server under heavy load. Zero seg faults since the upgrades.
Steffen, love your builds. Keep up the good work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Steffen
Moderator
Joined: 15 Oct 2005
Posts: 3092
Location: Hilversum, NL, EU
|
| Posted: Tue 26 Aug '08 12:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Read on the APR list. Looks like the by Sob reported bug 45321 in bugzille has attention.
| William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: | I'm thinking this is a healthy time to start crawling through bugzilla and
the list for various patches folks are asking us to apply, and either apply
or close them (excluding 2.0 suggestions, of course). I'd really like to
roll a non-critical 1.3.5 a week from now, one that isn't make or break on
any particular httpd or svn release.
So over the week, I'm going to apply any missing mingw/cygwin patches, and
fix the ipv6 socket bug on win2008/vista v.s. windows "other". If a few
committers can pitch in, I'll be we can cut bugzilla down to size.
I'm not asking that we "break" 1.3.5, but that we give some patches a chance
and avoid being overly cautious. Without the downstream pressure to roll
a release right now, I'm hoping we can clear these out.
Bill |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
