Keep Server Online
If you find the Apache Lounge, the downloads and overall help useful, please express your satisfaction with a donation.
or
A donation makes a contribution towards the costs, the time and effort that's going in this site and building.
Thank You! Steffen
Your donations will help to keep this site alive and well, and continuing building binaries. Apache Lounge is not sponsored.
| |
|
 Topic: Tomcat Loadbalancing Load Test |
|
| Author |
|
SMc
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
 Posted: Sun 05 Mar '06 1:07 Post subject: Tomcat Loadbalancing Load Test |
 |
|
Would be interested to know if anyone has made any load tests on their applications, and how they compare to mine.
I am Running Apache v2.2 serving Tomcat1 and Tomcat2 (v5.5.15) in a loadbalancing configuration with mod_jk
Using Jmeter to simulate 50 users making various page accesses in my application.
I compared the idential test on the Tomcat1 & Tomcat2 config and again on a single native Tomcat:8080 config.
The Native Tomcat config is around 50-60% faster that the loadbalanced.
It's a hell of a trade off !
Regards,
SMc |
|
| Back to top |
|
James Blond
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 7373
Location: Germany, Next to Hamburg
|
| Posted: Wed 08 Mar '06 15:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| If not using mod_jk maybe using reverse proxy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
SMc
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
| Posted: Wed 08 Mar '06 20:39 Post subject: |
|
|
...do you mean try the same tests using mod_proxy to see which is faster ?
SMc |
|
| Back to top |
|
James Blond
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 7373
Location: Germany, Next to Hamburg
|
| Posted: Wed 08 Mar '06 21:58 Post subject: Re: Tomcat Loadbalancing Load Test |
|
|
| SMc wrote: | The Native Tomcat config is around 50-60% faster that the loadbalanced.
|
I would try! With mod_jk, without, with balancer, without and so on. Please tell me, what is the fastet solution! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
